WSL clubs are spending millions on transfers this summer. Nobody knows what most of the players actually earn

Chelsea paid at least $1.3 million to sign Alyssa Thompson from Angel City this summer, with add-ons that could push the deal close to $2 million. That’s roughly £1 million, give or take. The transfer fee was partially disclosed — a rarity in the women’s game — but her salary, like almost everyone else’s, stayed secret.

Leah Williamson committed her future to Arsenal with a new contract signed in April 2026. The club announced it with a social post and a quote from the player. No financial terms. Not the salary, not the length, not whether it included bonuses or image rights.

Katie Zelem left Manchester United for Angel City on a free transfer after her contract expired. No fee. No disclosed salary at either end. Just a statement confirming she’d gone.

Three moves. One pattern.

The money is real. The numbers aren’t.

In the men’s Premier League, transfer fees are routinely reported by clubs and compiled by sites like Transfermarkt. Player wages are estimated by Capology and Spotrac, based on leaks, agent briefings and financial filings. The data is imperfect but directionally useful.

In the women’s game, even the direction is hard to establish. The average WSL salary of £47,000 comes from a single BBC report in 2022. Minimum wages were introduced for the first time in 2025-26, but the exact figures were not published at the announcement — they emerged months later through a separate report on living wage compliance.

When a player moves to a WSL club and the fee is “undisclosed,” it could be £50,000 or £500,000. When a contract is extended without terms, the player could have doubled their salary or taken a pay cut. Nobody outside the negotiating room can tell the difference.

What would change if clubs published the numbers

Disclosed transfer fees and published salary bands would do three things.

First, they’d let players and agents negotiate from knowledge rather than rumour. You cannot bargain effectively when you don’t know what your peers earn.

Second, they’d let journalists and fans hold clubs to account on equal pay and investment commitments. The WSL’s broadcast deals and sponsorship revenue are growing. Is the money reaching the players? Without numbers, that question is unanswerable.

Third, they’d make the business of women’s football legible to sponsors, broadcasters and investors who currently operate on estimates and hope. That matters for the next rights cycle.

The counter-argument, offered by several WSL clubs, is that publishing salaries would create awkward comparisons — between teammates, between clubs, between the women’s and men’s games. That argument is essentially that sunlight is uncomfortable. It’s not a structural objection. It’s a preference for operating in the dark.

What we actually know

Three confirmed transfers. One partially disclosed fee. Three undisclosed salaries.

That is the entire public record of WSL player movement this summer, because the league and its clubs choose not to tell us more.

The spending is real. The figures, for the most part, are not. Until that changes, every reported transfer fee and salary estimate is just a guess dressed up as journalism.

Three moves, zero disclosed salaries: Chelsea paid ~£1m for Alyssa Thompson (fee partially disclosed). Williamson signed a new Arsenal deal (no terms). Zelem moved on a free (no salary at either end). The WSL publishes no salary data; the £47,000 average figure dates from a single BBC report in 2022.

Related articles

• Trinity Rodman makes £1.6m a year, the gap between elite and everyday WSL pay
• How women’s football clubs actually make money
• NWSL vs WSL: which league actually pays more?
• Does the WSL have a salary cap? Minimum wages explained